Group warns US-driven plans bow to interests of Israel, which continues to carry out near-daily violations of truce.
Lebanon’s cabinet has again met to discuss the disarmament of Hezbollah despite the latter’s earlier rejection of the demands, which have largely been driven by the United States.
Lebanon’s Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said after the meeting on Thursday that ministers approved the “objectives” of a US proposal for “ensuring that the possession of weapons is restricted solely to the state”.
Lebanon’s information minister had said earlier that, while the cabinet endorsed the objectives of the US proposal for disarming Hezbollah by the end of the year, along with ending Israel’s military operations in the country, it had not discussed specific timelines.
Hezbollah Political Council Deputy Chief Mahmoud Komati called the Lebanese government’s decision a “march in humiliation” and surrender to Israel and the US.
“There is no state or government in the world that confronts the resistance in its own territory while the enemy is still there occupying the land and carrying out aggressions against Lebanon daily,” Komati told media Mubasher.
He added that Hezbollah would continue to exercise its right to resist Israel under the UN Charter, which asserts the “inherent right of individual or collective self-defence”.
The talks came two days after ministers announced they were planning to restrict arms to six official forces by the end of the year. Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc accused the government of “slipping into accepting American demands” that would serve Israel’s interests.
Hezbollah ministers and Shia Muslim allies in the Lebanese cabinet withdrew from the cabinet meeting in protest during discussions about the proposal to disarm Hezbollah, three Lebanese political sources told Reuters.
After Thursday’s meeting, a US Department of State spokesperson said the US welcomed the Lebanese government’s decision to task the Lebanese Armed Forces to bring all weapons under state control.
Under the truce, Israel was meant to completely withdraw from Lebanon. Hezbollah, meanwhile, was to pull its fighters north of the Litani River, around 30 kilometres (20 miles) north of the border with Israel, to be replaced by the expanded deployment of the Lebanese army and United Nations Interim Forces in Lebanon (UNIFIL).
Hezbollah said on Wednesday that it would treat the government’s decision to disarm it “as if it did not exist”, accusing the cabinet of committing a “grave sin”.
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told Iranian state TV on Wednesday that this was not the first time that attempts have been made to disarm the Iran-backed group, adding that the final decision rests with the group itself.
“We act as a supporter, but we do not interfere in their decision-making,” Araqchi added.
Citing “political sources”, pro-Hezbollah newspaper Al Akhbar said the group, and its ally the Amal Movement, could choose to withdraw their four ministers from the government or trigger a no-confidence vote by parliament’s Shia bloc, which comprises 27 of Lebanon’s 128 lawmakers.
Israel, which routinely carries out air strikes in Lebanon despite the November ceasefire, has already signalled it would not hesitate to launch destructive military operations if Beirut failed to disarm the group.
The government’s decision is unprecedented since the end of Lebanon’s civil war more than three decades ago, when the country’s armed factions – with the exception of Hezbollah – agreed to surrender their weapons.
United Arab Emirates Dirham Exchange Rate
